top of page

At a Certain Stage, Your Business Stops Needing You as the Best Consultant

  • 23 hours ago
  • 4 min read
Misogyny in financial advice

At a Certain Stage, Your Business Stops Needing You as the Best Consultant

“I’d like not to wake up every morning at 3 or 4 with answers to work problems.”


That’s how she put it.


The business wasn’t in trouble. It was profitable. It had demand. The team was competent. Clients were happy. If you looked at the numbers, there was nothing alarming there.


But she was waking up most nights with solutions forming in her head before the sun came up. Not because there was a crisis, but because her brain was holding the entire system together. Every decision, every risk, every weak point lived with her.


She thought that meant she needed to improve. She assumed the stress was evidence that she wasn’t operating at the right level yet. That maybe she needed better discipline, better habits, better thinking.


That’s a very common interpretation.


Especially for women.


Because once you layer in everything else – the home life, the kids, the invisible logistics, the sense that if you’re ambitious you should also be grateful and composed and fully present – the pressure compounds. You’re building something substantial and at the same time you’re meant to be calm, available and emotionally generous at home.


So when work follows you into the kitchen and the bedtime routine and you feel distracted or irritable, it doesn’t just feel inconvenient. It feels like a personal failing. You show up half-present, you notice it, you judge yourself for it, and then you take that judgment back to work and try to compensate.


That cycle can run for years.


The interesting part in her case was that revenue wasn’t the issue. This wasn’t someone scraping by. The business generated strong income. On paper, it had outgrown the survival stage a long time ago.


What hadn’t changed was the operating model.


When we looked at the structure, it became clear that the business still relied heavily on her billable output. Margins worked, but only if utilisation stayed high. The systems produced data, but someone had to assemble the insight manually. Reporting existed, but leadership was still interpreting and stitching it together rather than being handed clear answers.


Nothing was technically broken. That’s what makes this stage so hard to recognise.


The model had simply reached its limit.


At a certain stage of maturity, the business no longer needs its founder to be its highest-performing consultant. It needs its founder to be its highest-leverage decision-maker. But if the economic structure still rewards billable hours and visible output, the founder stays in production mode because that’s where the financial feedback sits.


So you end up in a strange middle ground. You’re responsible for capital allocation, risk management, long-term direction, and at the same time you’re still being pulled into delivery because that’s how the model was designed in the early days.


That tension is what shows up at 3am.


Most founders interpret that tension as ambition or pressure or just “this is what scaling feels like.” And sometimes growth does require more from you. But if growth consistently increases anxiety rather than reducing it, it’s usually not about effort.


It’s about structure.


When a business is intensity-held, it depends on the founder’s mental bandwidth to remain stable. Every small wobble lands in her head first. Every decision requires her attention. Even when there is a capable team, the system still routes clarity through her.


A structure-held business works differently. Margins include room for normal variability. Capital isn’t distributed automatically; it’s allocated with purpose so the business can absorb shocks. Reporting produces insight without leadership having to build it from scratch each month. Roles are designed around leverage, not just labour.


None of that is glamorous. It doesn’t show up on social media. It doesn’t look like hustle.


It does change how often you wake up at 3am.


What struck me most in her case was how quickly the self-criticism softened once she understood that nothing was wrong with her. The operating model that had carried her through the early years had simply expired. It had done its job. It just hadn’t evolved with the business.


We don’t talk enough about expiry in scaling businesses. We talk about growth targets and revenue milestones, but we don’t talk about the point where the original design starts creating friction instead of momentum.


And that friction often gets mislabelled as stress tolerance.


When I see founders at this stage – multi six figures, small team, solid demand – the question I’m usually asking isn’t how to push harder. It’s what the business still requires from them that it shouldn’t.


Because once you start there, the conversation changes. You stop asking how to cope better and start asking what needs to be redesigned.


And in my experience, the moment that shift happens, the 3am wake-ups start to look less like a personal flaw and more like a signal that the business has outgrown its original shape.




Business Reset Intensive


A fast, personalised CFO-level diagnostic for women running small service-based businesses who are capable, ambitious, and completely over feeling confused, overwhelmed or underpaid.



Comments


bottom of page